Option Focus | Tesla’s $4.65 Million Synthetic Put and $2.48 Million Deep OTM Put Buy Reveal Institutional Bearish Conviction

Option Witch
Sep 29

Tesla closed at 357.45 USD, down 3.94 %.

Tesla’s options tape showed a clear institutional tilt toward downside protection, led by a $4.65 million net-debit synthetic put and a $2.48 million deep out-of-the-money put purchase. The largest orders were concentrated in bearish structures, with market participants positioning for substantial weakness over multi-year horizons rather than chasing upside exposure.

>>>Start OPTIONS trading & earn up to SGD 200 in rewards!

Options Indicators

Tesla’s implied volatility is 46.32%, and with an IV percentile of 19.52%, current volatility sits on the low side of its recent range, indicating that options are cheaply priced rather than expensive. The IV/HV ratio of 1.07 suggests implied volatility is only modestly above historical volatility, so current option premiums do not appear meaningfully stretched.

The Call/Put volume ratio is 1.71.

Large Trades

A synthetic put worth a $4.65 million net debit was the largest displayed trade, pairing a long Jan. 19, 2029 $350.00 put with a short Jan. 19, 2029 $630.00 call for 2,000 contracts each. With Tesla referenced at $357.45, the $350.00 put was slightly out of the money and the $630.00 call was deeply out of the money, making this a clearly bearish synthetic structure that benefits from downside in the stock over a long time horizon. The use of a net-debit synthetic put suggests the trader was willing to pay meaningful premium to establish a longer-dated bearish stance, likely expressing conviction that Tesla could weaken materially while also accepting the risk tied to the short upside call leg.

A put buy worth $2.48 million was the other displayed large trade, consisting of 3,000 contracts of the Dec. 17, 2027 $200.00 put purchased outright. With the stock at $357.45, this strike was far out of the money, so the trade looks like a longer-dated downside bet or tail-risk hedge aimed at protecting against a major drawdown rather than positioning for only a modest pullback. Overall, the large-trade flow points clearly bearish, as the biggest orders were concentrated in downside structures and outright put buying, indicating that institutional participants were more focused on protecting against or positioning for substantial weakness in Tesla than on chasing upside exposure.

Strategy Reference

For a lower assignment probability on the call side, a seller could consider shorting the Jan. 19, 2029 $630.00 call or a nearer-dated 20-delta call, while a bear put spread using the $350.00/$200.00 strikes offers defined-risk downside exposure without the margin burden of a synthetic position.

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Most Discussed

  1. 1
     
     
     
     
  2. 2
     
     
     
     
  3. 3
     
     
     
     
  4. 4
     
     
     
     
  5. 5
     
     
     
     
  6. 6
     
     
     
     
  7. 7
     
     
     
     
  8. 8
     
     
     
     
  9. 9
     
     
     
     
  10. 10